Why do we even need politicians?

Yeah but they tend not to go to war with a nuclear superpower.

The Ukraine situation is obviously serious however I don't think that there's any doubt that Putin's the aggressor here. The fact remains that we have an utter clown in No 10 who is interested in nothing more than getting other cunts to pay for his lifestyle and shagging. What's he going there to negotiate? His fucking hole? A suitcase of vodka?

I've been to Ukraine and I can confirm that there is bad history with Russia going back centuries. More importantly though, the fanny is undoubtedly the finest in Europe, if not the world and we should be doing all we can to preserve it.

I didn't think that the Anglo-American approach was based on diplomacy anyway? Wasn't the plan to deploy loads of big fucking guns and transportes full of cannon fodder?

They are going to town on that photo

BJ's chief advisor has resigned. There is someone in #10 with morals.

The word on the street is BJ was advised before Monday's session not to use the Saville 'quip' but he couldnt help himself.
Does he have an advisor who goes through all his public remarks?

If he wanted to be 'absolutely clear' because 'it is really important' he should have qualified his words on Monday, or even PMQ Wednesday.

news.sky.com/story/munira-mirza-boris-johnsons-policy-chief-quits-over-use-of-jimmy-savile-slur-against-sir-keir-starmer-12532074
news.sky.com/story/boris-johnson-tries-to-clarify-jimmy-savile-slur-against-sir-keir-starmer-after-days-of-criticism-12531941

Well, this is what will illustrate Johnson's general contempt for anyone not on his team.  That he has a team to help him with replies to unknown questions is sad enough but that there was even mention of such a ridiculous comment is damning.  I can see why his advisors are fucking off.  Not going there with the Saville comment was a no brainer.  That he ignored such obvious wise advice and decided to ad lib it is a bit disturbing.  He's an enormous helmet and not even close to be being remotely fit for purpose.

I reckon so. BJ's mantra all along has been lets wait for the report, lets wait for the police investigation. But those involved must be thinking get out now. 

BJ has tried to fob off his initial outburst in HoC by saying he was merely saying Starmer apologised for his department's failings, like he did about partygate. His arse licking MPs are backing him, saying he clarified what he meant days later. Hardly needs clarification. If he had said later, soz, heat of the moment, the words came out wrong, I'm sorry, then you might forgive him. But no, he tries to change history, I didnt say those things. 

This wanker cant even answer a simple question - Would you have said what BJ said? (Starmer/Savile issue). I guess the Energy Minister thought he was just going to be  interviewed on the energy crisis, but you have to be prepared to tell the truth otherwise when he is dealing with the crisis and telling us what to do, do you believe him?
news.sky.com/story/boris-johnson-minister-claims-four-downing-street-resignations-are-prime-minister-taking-charge-minister-says-12532414

That bollocks, he said Starmer was a former head of DPP and spent most of his time prosecuting journalists and failing to prosecute Savile.  
He goes on to say Starmer prejudged the results of a police investigation, and that he was not going to do that.
Yet 5 days later MPs are saying the resignations are BJ taking charge, getting rid of staff before the police have finished their investigation. 

If MPs are signing letters of no confidence because their constituents are asking them to, they cant be blamed for not backing their leader.
I wrote to mine Tuesday morning. Fuck all chance Sir Robert doing that. He backed Dominic Raab in the 1st round of votes before backing BJ. Imagine Raab as PM!